Jewels at the NYCB
Jewels
New York City Ballet
June 3, 20011
Rubies was okay, nothing more. Megan Fairchild and Joaquin de Luz are both great technicians, but for some reason the sass and swagger that are so important in this ballet were decidedly missing from the performance. Fairchild has great technique, impressive elevation, a wonderful jump, and a winning smile. But she's still dancing "small," as if she were afraid to really go for broke and sell her performance, and Rubies is all about hard sell. Savannah Lowery as the Tall Girl gave the best performance. She's really an energetic, committed performer, although she isn't blessed with a particularly beautiful body or face. I loved the evident pleasure on her face when the male corps de ballet manipulated her legs this way and that way.
Diamonds is always a let-down for me, after the magnificence of Emeralds and Rubies. Other than the grand pas de deux, I feel like this ballet goes on for way too long and has some real filler work with the corps de ballet. It takes a really special ballerina to make Diamonds sparkle. Wendy Whelan is now unfortunately no longer at the stage in her career where she can pull Diamonds off. She gave a polished, professional performance, but the tension in her upper body, always there, is now distracting from the classical line. When she does those repeated lunge arabesques, you can see how her shoulders are tense and so what's supposed to be reckless and beautiful looks careful and small-scale. She can still do a leotard ballet like Agon, but in this very classical role, it just doesn't look right. Tyler Angle was a good partner, but overall the finale of Diamonds seemed anti-climactic.
Ivy, perhaps you can explain to me what there is to like about the Emeralds act, which I have alays considered the weakest link of "Jewels." Frankly, I usually close my eyes and simply listen to Faure's delightful music. And granted, a "plotless" ballet has no plot, but is "Emeralds" supposed to convery any meaning at all to the spectator (as does "Rubies", for example)?
ReplyDeleteI absolutely adore Emeralds as a mood piece. I see it as very Romantic, particularly the two "walking" pas de deux, which seem like two couples strolling in the woods. It's like Balanchine's Les Sylphides. I also love the melancholy ending to Emeralds, when the women just wander off and the men are left alone onstage. I don't know if there's "meaning" in it but I find it very romantic.
ReplyDelete