Manon


Massenet - Manon
Metropolitan Opera
March 31, 2012

This might be the minority opinion but I thought Anna Netrebko's Anna Bolena was a beautiful failure. The role of the tragic queen didn't suit either her voice or her character, and as a result there was a leaden quality to her portrayal that made the long, stately opera even longer and statelier. Last night, the Netrebko I know and love was back, and how wonderful it was to see her again doing what she does best -- charming both the audiences and other cast members with her beautiful, lush soprano voice and her innate joie de vivre.


The title role in Masssenet's Manon on the surface doesn't seem like a good fit for Netrebko's voice either. Netrebko's diction can be cloudy -- she drops consonants, Joan Sutherland style, to achieve this very round, opulent sound. As a result I don't even know French but I do know that it's not supposed to sound like what Netrebko is singing/speaking. Her dark, cello-like timbre also doesn't really match some of the lighter, more high-flying parts of the role like the famous Gavotte.

But somehow, none of it mattered. Netrebko was in magnificent voice last night -- perhaps the best I have ever heard her. The waves of sound she hurled out into the auditorium were as seductive to the audience as the moves she put on des Grieux. The Hotel de Transylvanie scene was dominated by Netrebko's spellbinding presence and voice. She sang two perfect, on pitch high D's that she had apparently ducked opening night. In the Gavotte she even showed off a nice trill (yes, apparently, when she wants to, she has a pretty good trill), as well as a surprising ability to lighten her voice and negotiate the more florid music. But her best moment was in the St. Sulpice scene -- when she sang "Is this not my hand pressing yours? Is this no longer my voice? Is it no more for you like a caress, just as it used to be?" it encapsulated in a few lines the Netrebko appeal. Her voice is like a drug, a enveloping wall of sound that caresses the ear. People can carp all day about her cloudy diction, her rhythmic slackness, her spotty intonation, but I am still enthralled by the sheer sound of her voice.

Dramatically Netrebko showed an understanding of the part that was deeper than Laurent Pelly's surprisingly bland production. She is now 40 and a mother, but her inner coquette is still there in spades. She looked absolutely stunning. Netrebko's Manon appeared onstage looking very innocent, hair in long braids and a peasant skirt, but just from the way she sat, with her legs swinging playfully, you knew that this girl was a player. The mixture of feminine charm, selfishness, and perhaps (???) genuine love -- Netrebko had it all. The last part was maybe the most intriguing part of Netrebko's portrayal. She always kept the audience (and des Grieux) guessing about her true feelings. I have known Manons in my life and I find that this quality is their most irresistible appeal. One minute they are warm, sexy, and loving, the next cold, grasping, and rejecting, and they play men like ping pong balls with this "I love you I love you not" game. Even in her death scene Manon seemed more upset about dying than being eternally parted from des Grieux.

Piotr Beczala's des Grieux was a big improvement over his Romeo last year, which I found stilted and vocally underpowered. His tenor instrument is still on the slender side, and it has a squeezed, tube-of-sound quality I don't really like. He came to grief with "Ah fuyez" and sounded hoarse and shouty. But the difference was his dramatic involvement.  Musically and dramatically, he embodied the part of the ardent, foolish young man. Also, when he doesn't force his voice, it can be quite lovely -- "En fermant les yeux" was one of those moments. His chemistry with Netrebko was strong, and when at the end of the St. Sulpice scene she ripped off his robe and the two of them rolled in bed it actually seemed like an organic and natural progression of the drama rather than stage business.

Paulo Szot was Manon's sleazy cousin Lescaut and his light voice really in the old days would be called a "salon baritone." It doesn't really have enough weight or color to project into a 4,000 person house. Volume is not the issue -- there are singers with far smaller voices. The voice just has no impact. Fabio Luisi was fine conducting the more dramatic portions of the opera but I thought really didn't have a feel for the atmospheric "cheery bustling Paris" music that Massenet inserts into the opera at various times to set the background.

Laurent Pelly's production was a disappointment. I enjoyed his Fille du Regiment immensely but this production seemed to be an excuse to put Netrebko in several great-looking gowns ... and that's about it. All I have to say about the sets was that I was unaware Paris in the turn of the century was such a wheelchair-accessible place -- they mostly consisted of wheel-chair ramps that criss-crossed the stage. They evoked a kind of nothingness and nowhere-land and at times, detracted from the drama. It created, for one, an essential lack of performing space for the singers. For instance, at the end of thre Cours-la-Reine scene there is a little ballet that ends (in this production) with the ballerinas being carried off by the lecherous mob of men. Much of the choreography was hidden as the ballerinas danced behind the wheelchair ramps. The person-regie was basic and unimaginative. It's really a non-production production where I expect each Manon will probably come in and do her own schtick.

It was the spellbinding Netrebko who made the evening. In the final scene, Manon sings, "Oh lovely diamond! I am still a coquette." Yes you are, Miss Netrebko, and never, ever change.

Comments

  1. I thought Mr. Szot's voice was really good! I noticed his staging was mostly far upstage. He never quite sang the downstage. For sure, bad direction( horrible Mr. Pelly).
    I noticed, sometimes at the Met, that singers who are staged to sing far from the proscenium tend to "force" their voices... All because of a bad staging.... specially low voices... sopranos and tenor have that up ringing natural quality but mezzo's and baritones/bass suffer from this and that for sure it's a director fault.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also think and know that Mr. Szot's voice is really special and rich. Lescault's music is not attractive and I am sure it would not sound better in Hvorostovsky's or Gunn's voice either...
    Manon's music is about Manon and Des Grieux.
    Mr. Szot sang a beautiful aria in the III act. "A qu'a bon l'economie" and "Rosalinde" , lovely!
    I agree that Mr. Szot's spot on stage were horrible and a nightmare to any singer.

    Linda

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks God you're a Biologist!
    You know nothing about good singing....

    ReplyDelete
  4. I saw the April 11 performance and while I also dislike this production, agree that Anna makes it all happen and is a true star. I loved her and forgive her under-pitch top notes in Cours-La-Reine - who cares? She is believable and has heart and soul, in addition to the voice. I cried after "La Reve" and have never seen Beczala is such great form - the two of them were fabulous together.

    Paulo Szot? Is this the same person who bowled me over in South Pacific? Granted, the theatre in Lincoln Center is a fraction of the size of the Met, but really , his instrument is not large enough for this hall. There is nothing distinctive about his voice - he's a random baritone, pushing through the music and doing nothing to make Lescaut a real character. He has filled out quite a bit since "South Pacific" and spent the evening pulling on his uniform jacket that didn't fit him, looking uncomfortable. Lescaut is an interesting role - the character is reprehensibly sleazy and a real actor-singer could make a meal out of this, but Szot doesn't even try, and is (poorly) directed to run up and down the stairs all night and not much more. M. Guillot, on teh other hand, was given a great deal of weight in this production and was a real adversary as well as a figure of pity. It's probably more Pelly's fault that Szot's; this director tried to accomplish a lot but didn't quite get there, and Lescaut was probably just overlooked.

    There must be a better way to illustrate scenically what Pelly was going for. The levels signified (I guess) upward and downward mobility in society - steps, ramps and whatever the casino scene represented with its bunker-like combination of ramps and steps carved out of concrete - but the realization was ugly and anachronistic. Neon in the casino? I know that Pelly feels that there is great ugliness in the story, but the ugliness and clunkiness of the physical production was at odds with the costumes, and also the music. And, if you are going to mess with perspective, please don't have life-size performers walking anywhere near your itty-bitty house and crane in the far distance in the last scene.

    I have seen Luisi so many times this season...maybe familiarity breeds contempt, but after a season I feel that he gets through the music but doesn't extract the oomph that Levine does. Levine always, always made the most out of the music and brought out the real soul of the piece. So far, Luisi doesn't do that - it may not be possible with the schedule, and he doesn't have the relationship with the players that Levine did, but it's disappointing.

    Ivy, thank you for letting me comment at this length. I have a blog but somehow I never write about opera.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Blue, it's always great to have your comments!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

COVIDammerung -- The End of the World in Met Streams

Comparing Nutcrackers Across the Pond

The Mechanical Flute