Slave Play: Can Love Overcome the Legacy of Slavery? SPOILERS; Little Women
Dustin and Gary in Slave Play, photo @ Matthew Murphy |
WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD
The plantation set by Clint Ramos |
The set design (by Clint Ramos) immediately gets the audience thinking. The stage is set up like a mirror, with a plantation projection in the background. The message seems obvious: when you look at these characters, also look within yourselves. Lights up, and three mixed-race couples enact what can only be called antebellum kink. These antebellum kink sketches remind the audience of the shameful sexual power slaveowners held over their slaves. The kink gets hotter and hotter, until one participant screams "Starbucks!"
That's apparently the safe word, and we find out that these three couples are actually in “Antebelkum Sexual Performance Therapy” to cure their bedroom woes. In each case, the black partner has been unable to orgasm with his or her white lover for quite some time. The leaders of this therapy group are a mixed-race lesbian couple, Tea and Patricia (played by Chalia La Tour and Irene Sofia Lucio). These therapists use the kind of annoying, reductive psychobabble lingo like "processing,” “unpacking,” and "speaking from a place of aggression" in such an aggravating way that one realizes that they too are enacting a toxic mixed-race relationship dynamic.
Nolan and Kalukango, photo @ Sara Krulwich |
McNamara and Jones, photo @ Matthew Murphy |
The final act left everyone in the theater shocked, stunned, shook, talking on the way out, trying to absorb what we'd just seen. My brain was in overdrive. I went home thinking about Slave Play, I will go to bed thinking about Slave Play, and will wake up still thinking about Slave Play. Slave Play is funny, thought-provoking, incendiary. Slave Play is everything theater can be but so rarely is. It will be a crime if this does not win a Tony for Best Play.
Now for those who have seen the play you can comment below: do you think Kaneisha ‘wanted it”? People in the theater around me all said yes and I lean towards yes, but other people I talked to said no.
In other news, I saw the newest adaptation of Little Women. Greta Gerwig's version despite some faults (Florence Pugh is an amazing older Amy, but is NOT believable as a 12-year-old as she has a super-deep, mature voice; Meryl Streep as Aunt March gives one of those performances that is full of tics and mannerisms; the Professor Bhaer storyline is even weaker than it usually is) is a moving version that nicely bookends the 1994 film. Gerwig emphasizes the feminist elements of the story without diluting the cozy March household scenes. It's a crying shame Gerwig was not nominated for an Academy Award for Best Direction
Gerwig's direction cuts back and forth between present and past, as Jo March tries to publish her novel. The flashback structure allows us to see how childhood joys turn into some harsher adult realities. The flashbacks between Beth's first illness and final illness was masterfully done. Soairse Ronan is simply radiant as Jo. She's strong, she's funny, she's vulnerable, and she plays the bittersweet reaction to Laurie (Timothée Chalamet) so beautifully that I sobbed big fat tears. It's possible to be happy for your childhood friend AND heartbroken at the same time, and Ronan balances those two reactions perfectly.
Alcott's story is as heartwarming as ever. I loved the interactions between the sisters -- their moments of love and their fights. I loved the almost-romance between Jo and Laurie. This is a movie that stays with you.
I kept thinking of this song when I think of Jo and Laurie:
Comments
Post a Comment